(Bold added to highlight a few points)
Copyright 2010. ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. The
Legal Intelligencer.
Page printed from:
The Legal Intelligencer
Allentown Lawyer Gets 6.5 Years for Fraud Conviction
Shannon P. Duffy
05-07-2010
A federal judge on Thursday imposed a 78-month prison term on John P.
Karoly Jr., an Allentown lawyer who confessed to filing false tax returns
that hid more than $4.2 million in income and who stood trial and was
convicted on money laundering charges for defrauding a charity.
"A lawyer who is not honest is a threat to the social order," U.S.
District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel said at the close of a two-day
sentencing hearing.
Prosecutors wanted Karoly to be taken into custody immediately, but
Stengel ordered that Karoly be given until July 6 to surrender himself and
said he would recommend that he serve his term in the federal prison in
Scranton, Pa.
Karoly, 60, was initially indicted on charges of faking his own
brother's will. Prosecutors said the brothers had long been estranged,
but that Karoly had conspired with his son, J.P. Karoly III, and Dr.
John Shane, to submit fake wills for Peter Karoly and his wife, Lauren
Angstadt, a dentist who died in a plane crash in February 2007.
According to the original indictment, John Karoly Jr. and Peter Karoly
had practiced law together until March 1986, when they dissolved their
firm, Karoly & Karoly, because of "unhappy differences."
But when Karoly agreed to plead guilty to tax charges, the government
agreed to drop all charges against Shane and Karoly's son, so that the
issue over the alleged faking of the will is to be decided by the
Northampton County Orphans' Court.
The court battle over Peter Karoly's will has divided the family, with
three of John Karoly's sisters joining forces to write a letter that
directly accused their brother of cheating them. In the packed courtroom,
the sisters and their spouses and families sat behind the prosecutors
while John Karoly's family and friends sat behind the defense table.
At the close of Thursday's court proceedings, federal marshals kept the
two groups apart, allowing the sisters and their group to leave first
while ordering the others to wait in the courtroom.
Defense attorney Robert Goldman, in an hour-long speech, urged Stengel
to be lenient, arguing that the case was being "pushed too hard" by the
prosecutors, and pleading with the judge to look not only at Karoly's
crimes but also at his lifetime of working hard for "the poor, the
downtrodden, and the abused."
Goldman also said Karoly faced a death sentence if significant prison
time were imposed because of his serious medical conditions including a
heart condition that led to a valve replacement and now requires blood
thinning drugs.
But Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin R. Brenner told Stengel that none of
the reasons Goldman had cited were valid justifications for leniency.
Instead, Brenner urged the judge to impose a sentence even stiffer than
the range of 78 to 97 months suggested by the guidelines in order to
account for Karoly's perjury at trial and his fabrication of a document
that he tried to use to trick the judge into acquitting him on the money
laundering charges.
Such conduct is "reprehensible" when committed by a lawyer, Brenner
said.
Brenner also argued that Karoly's status as a lawyer for especially
needy clients shouldn't save him from a punishment for defrauding a
charity.
"You can't be the guy who fights for the little guy and at the same
time defrauds his own church," Brenner said.
Stengel, at the close of the hearing, spoke for more than 20 minutes
and methodically addressed all of the lawyers' arguments.
One by one, Stengel rejected Goldman's arguments for downward
departures and explained that the guidelines, while merely advisory,
should be "the starting point."
Stengel said he found that Karoly had committed tax fraud and "did
so with criminal intent."
In a tax system that depends on voluntary filing and honesty, Stengel
said, there would be "chaos" if even a small percentage of taxpayers
behaved as Karoly did.
Lawyers, Stengel said, "are held to a special standard."
Stengel said he believed Karoly was very bright and extremely talented,
but that he "seems to have an honesty problem — and that has been his
downfall in this case."
Over the course of the proceedings, Stengel said he came to see that
Karoly "has a tremendous capacity for deception and self-dealing in his
business affairs and in his practice of law."
Imposing too light a sentence, Stengel said, would "diminish the
seriousness" of Karoly's crimes, and would send the wrong message because
the community is watching the case closely "to see if the powerful are
ever made to pay."
Karoly, directly addressing Stengel, said he wanted to apologize to the
court and to his wife, family and friends who "have all been deeply hurt
by my wrongdoings."
He said he also recognized that "the profession I hold dear has gotten
another black eye."
But he urged the judge to be lenient if only so that Karoly can
continue to care for his wife and sons. "They don't deserve that
punishment even if I do," he said. •
Update 3/18/2010 -
Case 5:08-cr-00592-LS Document 145